NATURAL PINEAPPLE RINGS vs JAMBA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
JAMBA wins in 11 out of 18 nutrient categories
NATURAL PINEAPPLE RINGS: 5
vs
JAMBA: 11
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL PINEAPPLE RINGS | JAMBA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 88.9 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 5.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL PINEAPPLE RINGS | JAMBA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 0 UG | 556 UG | |
| Niacin | 0 MG | 27.8 MG | |
| Pantothenic acid | 0 MG | 13.9 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 2 MG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 333.3 MG | |
| Vitamin K (phylloquinone) | 0 UG | 111.1 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL PINEAPPLE RINGS | JAMBA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 667 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 29 MG | 0 MG |