NATURAL GRASS FED GROUND BEEF vs BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL GRASS FED GROUND BEEF wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
NATURAL GRASS FED GROUND BEEF: 5
vs
BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL GRASS FED GROUND BEEF | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 212 cal | 183 cal | |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 16.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fat | 15.0 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL GRASS FED GROUND BEEF | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL GRASS FED GROUND BEEF | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 292 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 66 MG | 585 MG |