NATURAL DECADENCE vs DINNER ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL DECADENCE wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
NATURAL DECADENCE: 7
vs
DINNER ROLLS: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL DECADENCE | DINNER ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.0 g | |
| Carbs | 42.1 g | 40.9 g | |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL DECADENCE | DINNER ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 21.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL DECADENCE | DINNER ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 121 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 45 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 702 MG | 591 MG |