NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS vs BALL PARK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BALL PARK wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS: 2
vs
BALL PARK: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS | BALL PARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 288 cal | 160 cal | |
| Protein | 12.1 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 1.5 g | 4 g | |
| Fat | 25.8 g | 10 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS | BALL PARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS | BALL PARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 720 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 848 MG | 960 MG |