NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS vs BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS: 2
vs
BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS | BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 298 cal | 244 cal | |
| Protein | 14.0 g | 15.6 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 2.2 g | |
| Fat | 28.1 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS | BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL CASING HOT DOGS | BEEF CHEDDAR FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 89 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 895 MG | 978 MG |