NATURAL APPLE RINGS vs FRUIT BURST SQUEEZERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FRUIT BURST SQUEEZERS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
NATURAL APPLE RINGS: 3
vs
FRUIT BURST SQUEEZERS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL APPLE RINGS | FRUIT BURST SQUEEZERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 237 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 22.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 8 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL APPLE RINGS | FRUIT BURST SQUEEZERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 66.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL APPLE RINGS | FRUIT BURST SQUEEZERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 22 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 144 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 450 MG | 0 MG |