MOTEK CINNAMON RUGELACH vs CRESCENT ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CRESCENT ROLLS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
MOTEK CINNAMON RUGELACH: 0
vs
CRESCENT ROLLS: 6
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MOTEK CINNAMON RUGELACH | CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 370 cal | 357 cal | |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 45.7 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MOTEK CINNAMON RUGELACH | CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MOTEK CINNAMON RUGELACH | CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 152 MG | 821 MG |