MONSTER MARSH FILLED MARSHMALLOWS vs CHOCOROCKS RIVERSTONES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOROCKS RIVERSTONES wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
MONSTER MARSH FILLED MARSHMALLOWS: 3
vs
CHOCOROCKS RIVERSTONES: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MONSTER MARSH FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | CHOCOROCKS RIVERSTONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 423 cal | 511 cal | |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 73.1 g | 65 g | |
| Fat | 11.5 g | 28 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MONSTER MARSH FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | CHOCOROCKS RIVERSTONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MONSTER MARSH FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | CHOCOROCKS RIVERSTONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 15 MG | 90 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 38 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 19 MG | 58 MG |