MISS MARY'S ITALIAN DRESSING vs LITE CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITE CAESAR DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
MISS MARY'S ITALIAN DRESSING: 0
vs
LITE CAESAR DRESSING: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MISS MARY'S ITALIAN DRESSING | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 60.7 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MISS MARY'S ITALIAN DRESSING | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MISS MARY'S ITALIAN DRESSING | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 393 MG | 600 MG |