MINI M&M COOKIES M&M BAKING BITS vs SNICKERDOODLE SOFT BAKED COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SNICKERDOODLE SOFT BAKED COOKIES wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
MINI M&M COOKIES M&M BAKING BITS: 3
vs
SNICKERDOODLE SOFT BAKED COOKIES: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MINI M&M COOKIES M&M BAKING BITS | SNICKERDOODLE SOFT BAKED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 440 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 68 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 14 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MINI M&M COOKIES M&M BAKING BITS | SNICKERDOODLE SOFT BAKED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MINI M&M COOKIES M&M BAKING BITS | SNICKERDOODLE SOFT BAKED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 60 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 440 MG |