MINI CLASSIC ITALIAN CANNOLI vs APPLE FILLED CRESCENT ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
APPLE FILLED CRESCENT ROLLS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
MINI CLASSIC ITALIAN CANNOLI: 3
vs
APPLE FILLED CRESCENT ROLLS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MINI CLASSIC ITALIAN CANNOLI | APPLE FILLED CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 344 cal | 305 cal | |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 5.1 g | |
| Carbs | 37.5 g | 44.1 g | |
| Fat | 15.6 g | 11.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MINI CLASSIC ITALIAN CANNOLI | APPLE FILLED CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 20.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MINI CLASSIC ITALIAN CANNOLI | APPLE FILLED CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 188 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 161 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 62 MG | 661 MG |