MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED BISCUITS vs KINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED BISCUITS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED BISCUITS: 7
vs
KINGS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED BISCUITS | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 531 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 70.8 g | 72.5 g | |
| Fat | 26.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 8.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED BISCUITS | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED BISCUITS | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 88 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 177 MG | 25 MG |