MIKE AND IKE vs LONG LASTING CHEWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
MIKE AND IKE: 2
vs
LONG LASTING CHEWS: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MIKE AND IKE | LONG LASTING CHEWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 350 cal | 353 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 90 g | 82.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MIKE AND IKE | LONG LASTING CHEWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MIKE AND IKE | LONG LASTING CHEWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 75 MG | 147 MG |