MEDIUM PINK SHRIMP vs WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MEDIUM PINK SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
MEDIUM PINK SHRIMP: 4
vs
WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MEDIUM PINK SHRIMP | WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MEDIUM PINK SHRIMP | WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 65 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 267 MG | 286 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 121 MG | 67 MG |