MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP vs WILD ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP: 3
vs
WILD ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 62 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 12.4 g | 23.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ARGENTINE RED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 24 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 130 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 398 MG | 208 MG |