MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP vs CAMARON ENTERO WHOLE SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP: 5
vs
CAMARON ENTERO WHOLE SHRIMP: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | CAMARON ENTERO WHOLE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 cal | 314 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 67.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | CAMARON ENTERO WHOLE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 1 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | CAMARON ENTERO WHOLE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 65 MG | 536 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 9.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 63 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 1,796 MG |