MARSHMALLOWS vs HARD CANDIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOWS wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOWS: 3
vs
HARD CANDIES: 0
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOWS | HARD CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 350 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 85 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOWS | HARD CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOWS | HARD CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 80 MG | 0 MG |