MARSHMALLOWS vs MAPLE WALNUT FUDGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOWS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOWS: 4
vs
MAPLE WALNUT FUDGE: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOWS | MAPLE WALNUT FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 438 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 2.5 g | |
| Carbs | 80 g | 85 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOWS | MAPLE WALNUT FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOWS | MAPLE WALNUT FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 50 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 225 MG |