MARSHMALLOWS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOWS: 5
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOWS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 465 cal | 491 cal | |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 7.0 g | |
| Carbs | 65.1 g | 57.9 g | |
| Fat | 20.9 g | 28.1 g | |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOWS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOWS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 130 MG | 88 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 251 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 70 MG | 53 MG |