MARSHMALLOWS vs BUTTERSCOTCH FLAVORED HARD CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUTTERSCOTCH FLAVORED HARD CANDY wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOWS: 1
vs
BUTTERSCOTCH FLAVORED HARD CANDY: 2
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOWS | BUTTERSCOTCH FLAVORED HARD CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 329 cal | 206 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 75 g | 94.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOWS | BUTTERSCOTCH FLAVORED HARD CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOWS | BUTTERSCOTCH FLAVORED HARD CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 54 MG | 588 MG |