MARSHMALLOWS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOWS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOWS: 4
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOWS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 350 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 2.5 g | |
| Carbs | 76.7 g | 87.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOWS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOWS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 50 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 83 MG | 75 MG |