MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED COATING vs FRUIX MONSTER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED COATING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED COATING: 5
vs
FRUIX MONSTER: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED COATING | FRUIX MONSTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 378 cal | 100 cal | |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 68.9 g | 25.7 g | |
| Fat | 11.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED COATING | FRUIX MONSTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED COATING | FRUIX MONSTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 113 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 44 MG | 80 MG |