MARSHMALLOW TREES vs RUNTS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW TREES wins in 3 out of 12 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW TREES: 3
vs
RUNTS: 1
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW TREES | RUNTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 367 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 81.0 g | 93.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW TREES | RUNTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW TREES | RUNTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 7 MG |