MARSHMALLOW TREES vs CANDY WATCHES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW TREES wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW TREES: 4
vs
CANDY WATCHES: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW TREES | CANDY WATCHES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 344 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 87.5 g | 92.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW TREES | CANDY WATCHES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW TREES | CANDY WATCHES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 31 MG | 0 MG |