MARSHMALLOW POLE vs WESTERN FAMILY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WESTERN FAMILY wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW POLE: 0
vs
WESTERN FAMILY: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW POLE | WESTERN FAMILY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 90.5 g | 76.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW POLE | WESTERN FAMILY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW POLE | WESTERN FAMILY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 83 MG |