MARSHMALLOW CHICKS vs TOPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TOPS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 3
vs
TOPS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | TOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 324 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.5 g | |
| Carbs | 82.4 g | 75 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | TOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | TOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 150 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 6.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |