MARSHMALLOW CHICKS CANDY vs BUTTERSCOTCH DISCS HARD CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS CANDY wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS CANDY: 3
vs
BUTTERSCOTCH DISCS HARD CANDY: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS CANDY | BUTTERSCOTCH DISCS HARD CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 389 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 85.7 g | 94.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS CANDY | BUTTERSCOTCH DISCS HARD CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS CANDY | BUTTERSCOTCH DISCS HARD CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 278 MG |