MARSHMALLOW CHICKS vs SOUR BELTS CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 12 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 3
vs
SOUR BELTS CANDY: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | SOUR BELTS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 366 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 3.1 g | |
| Carbs | 85.7 g | 81.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | SOUR BELTS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | SOUR BELTS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 16 MG |