MARSHMALLOW CHICKS vs GUMMY TREES & SNOWMEN CANDIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GUMMY TREES & SNOWMEN CANDIES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 0
vs
GUMMY TREES & SNOWMEN CANDIES: 5
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | GUMMY TREES & SNOWMEN CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 300 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 80 g | 73.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | GUMMY TREES & SNOWMEN CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | GUMMY TREES & SNOWMEN CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 63 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 50 MG |