MARSHMALLOW CHICKS vs HAMMOND'S
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HAMMOND'S wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 1
vs
HAMMOND'S: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | HAMMOND'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 278 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 80 g | 61.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 5.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | HAMMOND'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | HAMMOND'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 111 MG |