MARSHMALLOW vs BUTTERSCOTCH DISCS HARD CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUTTERSCOTCH DISCS HARD CANDY wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW: 2
vs
BUTTERSCOTCH DISCS HARD CANDY: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW | BUTTERSCOTCH DISCS HARD CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 76.2 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW | BUTTERSCOTCH DISCS HARD CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 344 MG |