MARSALA COOKING WINE vs BALSAMIC GLAZE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSALA COOKING WINE wins in 2 out of 9 nutrient categories
MARSALA COOKING WINE: 2
vs
BALSAMIC GLAZE: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSALA COOKING WINE | BALSAMIC GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 167 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 23.3 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSALA COOKING WINE | BALSAMIC GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 600 MG | 0 MG |