MARLOW ALMONDS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
MARLOW ALMONDS: 3
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARLOW ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 534 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 24.1 g | |
| Carbs | 14.3 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fat | 46.4 g | 44.8 g | |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARLOW ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARLOW ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 34 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 14.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 17 MG |