MARGARET HOLMES vs SHOESTRING BEETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARGARET HOLMES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARGARET HOLMES: 5
vs
SHOESTRING BEETS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARGARET HOLMES | SHOESTRING BEETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 62 cal | 33 cal | |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 0.8 g | |
| Carbs | 10.8 g | 4.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARGARET HOLMES | SHOESTRING BEETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARGARET HOLMES | SHOESTRING BEETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 31 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 86 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 108 MG | 208 MG |