MAPLE FUDGE vs WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MAPLE FUDGE: 4
vs
WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE FUDGE | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 471 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 64.7 g | |
| Fat | 15 g | 20.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE FUDGE | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE FUDGE | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 90 MG | 59 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 70 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 167 MG | 412 MG |