MAPLE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE vs SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MAPLE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
MAPLE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE: 3
vs
SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fat | 53.3 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 700 MG | 643 MG |