LUNDS & BYERLYS vs BLUE RASPBERRY COTTON CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
vs
BLUE RASPBERRY COTTON CANDY: 0
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | BLUE RASPBERRY COTTON CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 348 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 87.0 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | BLUE RASPBERRY COTTON CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | BLUE RASPBERRY COTTON CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |