LUNDS & BYERLYS vs BLUE RASPBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS

Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving

Ad 468x60

BLUE RASPBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories

LUNDS & BYERLYS: 1 vs BLUE RASPBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 4 (7 ties)

Overview

Nutrient	LUNDS & BYERLYS	BLUE RASPBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS	Winner
Calories	357 cal	324 cal
Protein	0 g	2.9 g
Carbs	90.5 g	79.4 g
Fat	0 g	0 g	Tie
Fiber	0 g	0 g	Tie
Sugar	0 g	0 g	Tie

Vitamin	LUNDS & BYERLYS	BLUE RASPBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS	Winner
Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid	0 MG	0 MG	Tie
Vitamin D (D2 + D3)	0 UG	0 UG	Tie

Mineral	LUNDS & BYERLYS	BLUE RASPBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS	Winner
Calcium, Ca	0 MG	0 MG	Tie
Iron, Fe	0 MG	0 MG	Tie
Potassium, K	0 MG	3 MG
Sodium, Na	71 MG	0 MG

Ad 728x90