LUNDS & BYERLYS vs CHOPPED GARLIC
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 6
vs
CHOPPED GARLIC: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CHOPPED GARLIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 155 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 10.2 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CHOPPED GARLIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CHOPPED GARLIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 42 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 288 MG | 0 MG |