LUNDS & BYERLYS vs CLASSIC COTTON CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
vs
CLASSIC COTTON CANDY: 0
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CLASSIC COTTON CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 349 cal | 372 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 86.1 g | 97.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CLASSIC COTTON CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CLASSIC COTTON CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |