LUNDS & BYERLYS vs ASSORTED CHOCOLATES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 6
vs
ASSORTED CHOCOLATES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ASSORTED CHOCOLATES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 325 cal | 441 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 75 g | 67.7 g | |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 17.7 g | |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ASSORTED CHOCOLATES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ASSORTED CHOCOLATES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 250 MG | 106 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.5 MG | 2.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 282 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 338 MG | 176 MG |