LOWER SODIUM BACON vs PITMASTER THICK CUT BACON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PITMASTER THICK CUT BACON wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
LOWER SODIUM BACON: 0
vs
PITMASTER THICK CUT BACON: 2
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOWER SODIUM BACON | PITMASTER THICK CUT BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 533 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 33.3 g | 33.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOWER SODIUM BACON | PITMASTER THICK CUT BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOWER SODIUM BACON | PITMASTER THICK CUT BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,533 MG | 1,600 MG |