LOW SODIUM ALMONDS vs BUFFALO WING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW SODIUM ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
LOW SODIUM ALMONDS: 5
vs
BUFFALO WING: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOW SODIUM ALMONDS | BUFFALO WING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 607 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 21.4 g | 78.6 g | |
| Fat | 53.6 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOW SODIUM ALMONDS | BUFFALO WING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOW SODIUM ALMONDS | BUFFALO WING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 214 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 5.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 679 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 214 MG | 1,929 MG |