LONG LASTING CHEWS vs MARSHMALLOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW wins in 3 out of 9 nutrient categories
LONG LASTING CHEWS: 2
vs
MARSHMALLOW: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LONG LASTING CHEWS | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 385 cal | 381 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 87.2 g | 76.2 g | |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LONG LASTING CHEWS | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 115 MG | 36 MG |