LOFTHOUSE vs REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
LOFTHOUSE: 2
vs
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOFTHOUSE | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 474 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 63.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 21.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOFTHOUSE | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOFTHOUSE | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 395 MG | 0 MG |