LITEHOUSE vs RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LITEHOUSE: 0
vs
RANCH DRESSING: 5
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LITEHOUSE | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 442 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 27.9 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 37.2 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LITEHOUSE | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LITEHOUSE | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 512 MG | 933 MG |