LITE RASPBERRY VINAIGRETTE REDUCED FAT DRESSING vs LITE CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITE CAESAR DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
LITE RASPBERRY VINAIGRETTE REDUCED FAT DRESSING: 2
vs
LITE CAESAR DRESSING: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LITE RASPBERRY VINAIGRETTE REDUCED FAT DRESSING | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 16.7 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 15 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LITE RASPBERRY VINAIGRETTE REDUCED FAT DRESSING | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LITE RASPBERRY VINAIGRETTE REDUCED FAT DRESSING | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 867 MG |