LITE DRESSING vs COLESLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITE DRESSING wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
LITE DRESSING: 7
vs
COLESLAW DRESSING: 0
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LITE DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 21.9 g | |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 43.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LITE DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LITE DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 719 MG |