LITE CAESAR DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH LIGHT DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITE CAESAR DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LITE CAESAR DRESSING: 5
vs
CLASSIC RANCH LIGHT DRESSING: 0
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH LIGHT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 13.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH LIGHT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH LIGHT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 67 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 867 MG |