LITE CAESAR DRESSING vs RANCH SALAD DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH SALAD DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
LITE CAESAR DRESSING: 3
vs
RANCH SALAD DRESSING: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | RANCH SALAD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 15 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | RANCH SALAD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LITE CAESAR DRESSING | RANCH SALAD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 68 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 50 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 867 MG | 964 MG |